22 years old and still under attack--the ADA

July 26, 2012

The business community has long been seeking to require that they be given some notice before their failure to comply with federal accessibility law results in accountability.  The first such attempt was the “ADA Notification Act.” See H.R. 3590, 106th Cong., 2d Sess. (2000); S. 3122, 106th Cong., 2d Sess. (2000); H.R. 914, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. (2001); S. 782, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. (2001); H.R. 728, 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (2003).  Thankfully, it never got anywhere.

However, the attacks keep coming, the latest from Rep. Lungren, a Republican from California who has proposed the ironically named "ACCESS" Act.  The acronym is for "ADA Compliance for Customer Entry to Stores and Services."  You can read the text here:  http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3356/text

It simply seeks to require folks with disabilities, who have encountered barriers to their access to businesses, to give such businesses notice of the 22-year-old ADA and an "opportunity" to comply with it before they utilize their private right of action to enforce the ADA.  Cleary, 22 years is not nearly enough time to figure out how to stripe a parking lot, or to ramp an entry.

The Judiciary Committee held hearings in connection with this proposed legislation on June 27, 2012, and I've not heard any updates regarding it since.  Let's hope this one dies quickly. To make sure of it, write your member of congress!

Please reload

Featured Posts

Currently there are no rules or regulations from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to give guidance to public accommodations or public entities as to wh...

Website Content Accessibility Requirements and the ADA

July 29, 2016

Please reload

Recent Posts

September 22, 2015

September 8, 2015

Please reload

Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

© 2018 by Law Office of Edward I. Zwilling, LLC.


Required statement from the AL State Bar:  No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services provided by other lawyers.  Any recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors.   Disclaimer


  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon